Educational Technology for Equality: A Review

Anagrolia Faustino *

University Institute of Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India and Ministry of Education, Suye Secondary School, P.O. Box-1565, Arusha City Council, United Republic of Tanzania.

Inderpreet Kaur

University Institute of Teachers Training and Research, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


The use of technology in education should focus on treating students at all levels of education in the same manner, resulting in a change in the teaching and learning process and better learning outcomes for qualitative change in education. The study used Google Scholar for scanning and getting the information. This study seeks to scan factors associated with educational technology for equality. The review selected papers from 2014, 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021. The selected papers are based on educational technologies for equality in elementary, primary, secondary, and tertiary education.

The paper found that there is a need to make sure that everyone has the possibility to access technology, regardless of their disability. The paper suggests that education technology needs to consider equality in terms of gender, race, disability, language, social, and economic status, as well as academic hierarchy. These parameters need to be checked in order to have equality in the use of technology. The success of that will lead to a paradigm shift in education in all sectors, starting at the root of education.

The papers recommend that the government make policies about educational technology in all of the education systems, from the root of education to higher education. The application of technology to all foundations of education will lead to sustainable development in education.

Keywords: Education, technology, equality, race, disability, language

How to Cite

Faustino , Anagrolia, and Inderpreet Kaur. 2023. “Educational Technology for Equality: A Review”. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports 17 (7):102-7.


Download data is not yet available.


Huang R, Spector MJ, Yang J. Educational technology: A Primer for the 21st Century. Springer; 2019.

Bond M, Bedenlier S. Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: towards a conceptual framework. J Interact Media Educ. 2019; 2019(1):1-14.

Angeli C, Howard SK, Ma J, Yang J, Kirschner PA. Data mining in educational technology classroom research: can it make a contribution? Comput Educ. 2017;113:226-42.

Espinosa M-PP, Tudela P-AG, Fernández s-MS. Gender equality and ICT in the context of formal education: A systematic review. Media Educ Res J. 2020:9-19.

Scharber C, Pazurek A, Ouyang F. Illuminating the (in)visibility of female scholars: a gendered analysis of publishing rates within educational technology journals from 2004 to 2015. Gend Educ. 2019;31(1):33-61.

UN. Gender equality and empowerment of Women through ICT. Women 2000 and beyond; 2005.

Falah SA. Gender differences toward using educational technology in chemistry classes of Afghanistan Universities. 151-156. Int J Multidiscip Trends. 2021;3:1.

Wang X, Chen T, Zhang Y, Yang HH. Implications of the Delphi method in the evaluation of sustainability open education resource repositories. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26(4):3825-44.

Stevens PA, Dworkin AG. In: Stevens P, Dworkin A, editors The Palgrave Handbook of Race and Ethnic Inequalities in Education. Introduction to the handbook. 2nd Ed: Comparative Sociological Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Inequalities in Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.

Gonçalves LA, da Silva NN, Brooke N. An overview of research on race and ethnic inequalities in education. In: Stevens P, Dworkin A, editors. The Palgrave handbook of race and ethnic inequalities in education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.

Hersh M, Mouroutsou S. Learning technology and disability—overcoming barriers to inclusion: evidence from a multicountry study. Br J Educ Technol. 2019;50(6):3329-44.

Shaheen NL, Lohnes Watulak SW. Bringing disability into the discussion: examining technology accessibility as an equity concern in the field of instructional technology. J Res Technol Educ. 2019;51(2):187-201.

Valle JW, Connor DJ. Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2019.

Senjam SS, Foster A, Bascaran C, Vashist P, Gupta V. Assistive technology for students with visual disability in schools for the blind in Delhi. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(6):663-9.

DiPilla R. The Language of Equality: making gender equality and education a reality by 2030; 2019. Available from:

American University. What’s the difference between educational equity and equality?; 2020, April 16. [retrieved Sep 23, 2021 from]. Available:

Nami F. Educational smartphone apps for language learning in higher education: students’ choices and perceptions. Aust J Educ Technol. 2020;36(4): 82-95.

Lister K, Coughlan T, Owen N. Disability’ or ’Additional study needs’? Identifying students’ language preferences in disability-related communications. Eur J Secial Needs Educ. 2019:620-35.

McKenzie J, Pizzica J, Gosper M, Malfroy J, Rowe KA. Socio-economic status and students’ experiences of technologies: is there a digital divide? Critical perspectives on educational technology. In: Proceedings of the ascilite. 2014;688-92.

Tadesse S, Muluye W. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: A review. Open J Soc Sci. 2020;08(10):159-70.

Costa C, Alvelos H. Investigating the use and acceptance of technologies by professors in a higher education institution. Int J Online Pedagog Course Des. 2019; 9(2):20.