Stakeholders’ Awareness and Acceptability of the Vision, Mission, Goals, and Objectives of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, Volume 16, Issue 10,
Page 93-109
DOI:
10.9734/ajarr/2022/v16i10433
Abstract
Vision, mission, goals, and objectives (VMGOs) function as the foundation of an educational institution. The Accrediting Agency for Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines (AACCUP) underscored that an educational institution is assessed according to the degree how its VMGOs are achieved, but not in comparison with others. This descriptive research utilized the survey method to determine the levels of awareness and acceptability of the Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College in the Academic Year 2021-2022 among the stakeholders. 385 students, administrators, faculty, staff, parents, and alumni, who were selected using the random sampling technique answered the researcher-made instrument. For analysis, data were summarized primarily using mean and standard deviation. The results show the following: (a) The alumni, faculty, staff, and Bachelor of Arts in Social Science students indicated a “High” level of awareness of the Vision of the institution, while the English Language students, and the administrators indicated a “Very High” level of awareness; (b) All the groups indicated a “High” level of awareness of the Mission of the institution and of the Goal of the College of Arts and Sciences; (c) All stakeholders indicated a “High” level of awareness of the Bachelor of Arts in Social Science program objectives, a “High” level of awareness of the Bachelor of Arts in English Language program objectives except for students who indicated a “Very High” level of awareness, and a “High” level of awareness of the Bachelor of Science in Psychology program objectives except for the staff who indicated an “Average” level of awareness. The results also revealed the following: (a) All stakeholders indicated a “Very High” acceptability of the Vision of the institution except for the alumni and Social Science students who indicated a “High” level. (b) All groups indicated a “Very High” level of acceptability of the Mission of the institution and of the Goal of the College of Arts and Sciences except for the alumni and Psychology students who displayed a “High” level of acceptability. (c) All stakeholders showed a “Very High” level of acceptability of the program objectives of the three degree programs except for the staff who indicated a “High” level of acceptability of the Bachelor of Arts in English Language and Bachelor of Social Science program objectives and for the alumni and staff who indicated a “High” level of acceptability of the Bachelor of Science in Psychology program objectives.
- Vision
- mission
- goals
- objectives higher education institution
How to Cite
References
Pelicano AC, Lacaba LD. Awareness and Acceptability of the Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives of Eastern Samar State University. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences. 2016;3(6), ISSN (Online):2349–5219.
Villanca AA, Binayao BS, Caterial MZD, Ablanque VC. Assessing the Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives of a State University in Southern Philippines. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 2020;5(10): ISSN No:-2456-2165.
Abd Rahman, Siti Syuhada; Che Senik, Zizah; Nadzri, Suhaila. Content Analysis on Vision and Mission Statements of Selected Companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Economy, [S.l.]. 2020;2(4):170-184. ISSN 2682-8359.
Available:https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec/article/view/11888
Date accessed: 19 aug. 2022
Kose EK, Kose MF. Strategic Management and Leadership of Education: Central and Local Perspectives in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research. 2019;14(3):347-365.
DOI: 10.29329/epasr.2019.208.16
Hussein AM, Ahmed MM, Khudari MYM. The Impact of Strategic Planning in the University’s Competitiveness According to NIAS. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2021;10(5).
Available: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0125
Maleka S. Strategy Management and Strategic Planning Process. South African Perspective; 2014.
Nataraja S, Bright LK. Strategic Planning Implications in Higher Education. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 2018;8(2):1000339. ISSN: 2223-5833
Dotson R. Goal Setting to Increase Student Academic Performance. Journal of School Administration Research and Development; 2016.
Available:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1158116.pdf
Creswell JW. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2014.
Bentor SS, Bentor PMS, Bentor CTS. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). 2017;32(1):181-206.
CHED Memorandum Order No. 37, Series of 2012.
Available:https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.37-s2012.pdf
Güven ÖZDEM. An Analysis of the Mission and Vision Statements on the Strategic Plans of Higher Education Institutions; 2011.
Jonyo BO. The Effect of Mission and Vision on Organizational Performancе within Private Universities in Kenya. European Journal of Educational Sciences, EJES, June 2018 edition 2018;5(2):ISSN 1857- 6036.
Locke EA, Latham GP. Theory of Goal-setting and Task Performance. The Academy of Management Review; 1991.
DOI:10.2307/258875.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232501090_A_Theory_of_Goal_Setting_Task_Performance
Oducado RM. Survey Instrument Validation Rating Scale; 2020.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789575
-
Abstract View: 356 times
PDF Download: 96 times