Comparative Evaluation of Crude oil Degradability Efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Comamonas testosteroni in Soil

Main Article Content

N. P. Akani
D. N. Ogbonna
S. I. Douglas
V. G. Awari


Comparative evaluation of crude oil degradability efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Comamonas testosteroni with nutrient amendment were investigated in Crude oil Contaminated Soil. The bacteria species used in this study were isolated from the soil collected from Rivers state university research farm using standard microbiological methods. Evaluation and monitoring of bioremediation were done for a period of 56 days while analyses were carried at a constant interval of seven (7) days. Seven (7) experimental set-ups were employed using black polythene bag, The bags were perforated to enhance aeration,  each containing 5 kg of agricultural soil and left to fallow for 6 days, on the seventh day each of the experimental set-ups (5kg of soil) except the control (CTRL) were contaminated with crude oil (COCS) giving initial Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) value of 10328.03 mg/kg; after which it was allowed for 21 days to ensure even distribution and soil-oil bonding to mimic crude oil spill site before application of augmenting bacteria; Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BC) and Comamonas testosteroni (CM) and the stimulant; Goat manure (GM). Soil profile before and after contamination were analyzed while parameters like Sulphate, pH, Nitrate and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH), as well as microbial analyses such as Total Heterotrophic Bacteria (THB), Total Heterotrophic Fungi (THF), Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria (HUB) and Hydrocarbon Utilizing Fungi (HUF) were monitored and evaluated throughout the experimental period. Bioremediation efficiency was estimated from percentage (%) reduction of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) from day 1 to the residual hydrocarbon at day 56 of bioaugmented/biostimulation set-ups with the control. The microbiological result of the soil before and after contamination revealed that Bacillus sp had the highest percentage for bacterial isolates while Mucor sp. had the highest percentage for fungal isolates in both uncontaminated and contaminated soil. Colonial count of uncontaminated soil ranged from 5 x104 (HUB) <7 x 104 (HUF) <1.6 x 105 (THF) to 2.58 x 108 (THB) while contaminated soil colonial count ranged from 8 x 104 (HUB) < 9 x 104 (HUF) <2.0 x105 (THF) to 2.10x108 (THB). Microbial evaluation of the bioremediation set-ups showed increased colonial values with increase in time but slightly decreased on the last day. Results of total petroleum hydrocarbon revealed the actual amount of hydrocarbon reduction after the experiment and its percentage hydrocarbon remediated from the initial concentration in the various treatment setups  in the following  decreasing order;(CTRL) 125.71 mg/kg; 1.21% < (COCS + BC) 1855.74 mg/kg; 17.96% < (COCS + CM) 2261.01 mg/kg; 21.89% < (COCS + CM+ BC) 3321.23 mg/kg; 32.15% < (COCS + GM + BC) 4983.81 mg/kg; 48.25 < (COCS + GM + CM) 7313.47 mg/kg; 70.81%. Conclusively, the results obtained indicate that Comamonas testosteroni with nutrient amendment had the more degradability efficiency compared to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. It is therefore recommended that bioremediation crude oil polluted soil using bioaugmentation technique should be amended with organic nutrient to enhance efficiency.

Comparative, crude oil degradability, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Comamonas testosteroni, soil

Article Details

How to Cite
Akani, N. P., Ogbonna, D. N., Douglas, S. I., & Awari, V. G. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Crude oil Degradability Efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Comamonas testosteroni in Soil. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 9(2), 11-24.
Original Research Article


Ekanem J, Nwachukwu I. Sustainable agricultural production in degraded oil producing and conflict prone communities of Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability. 2015;8(1): 14-28.

Kvenvolden KA, Cooper CK. Natural seepage of crude oil into the marine environment. Book of Geology and Marine Environment. 2003;23(3-4):140–146.

Awari VG, Ibiene, AA, Ariole CN. A broad-range pH/temperature-stable cellulase from a novel hydrocarbon contaminated mangrove soil bacterium, Bacillus licheniformis VVA21. Microbiology Research Journal International. 2018;24 (2):1-14.

Thapa B, Ajay-Kumar K, Ghimire A. Review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2012;8(I): 164-170.

Das N, Chandran P. Microbial degradation of hydrocarbon contaminants; Am Overview. Journal of Biotechnology Research International. 2011;1:1–13.

Ron EZ, Rosenberg RE. Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Current Opinion. Biotechnology Journal. 2002;13(3):249– 52.

United Nations. The adverse impacts of oil pollution on the environment and wellbeing of a local indigenous community: The Experience of the Ogoni People of Nigeria; 2011.

Akani NP, Obire O. Bacterial population of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) exposed to an oilfield wastewater in Rivers State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Biological Science. 2014;7(5):208-216.

Obire O, Akinde SB. Comparative efficiency of cow dung and poultry manure in bioremediation of oil polluted soil. Niger Delta Biologia. 2006;5(2):82-91.

Finley SD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis BV. Insilico feasibility of novel biodegradation pathways for 1, 2, 4-trichlorobenzene. Journal of Biology and Medical Century. 2010;4(1):1–14.

Ogbonna DN. Application of biological methods in the remediation of oil polluted environment in Nigeria. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 2018;17(4):1-10.

Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC, Chikere BO. Bacterial diversity in tropical crude oil polluted soil undergoing bioremediation. Afrcian Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;8 (11):2535-2540.

Sathishkumar M, Arthur B, Sang-Ho B, Sei-Eok Y. Biodegradation of crude oil by individual bacterial strains and a mixed bacterial consortium isolated from hydrocarbon contaminated areas, soil, air, water. Advance Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;36:92- 96.

Abu GO, Moro KO. Glucose and hydrocarbon utilization by bacteria isolated from diesel impacted soil in the Niger delta. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Science. 2004;11:205-208.

Nrior RR, Echezolom EC. Assessment of bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil with biostimulatingagents. Current Studies in Comparative Education, Science and Tehnology. 2016;3(1):203-215.

Cheesebrough M. District laboratory practices in tropical countries (Second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

Menkit MC, Amechi AK. Evaluation of first and second order degradation rates and biological half-lives in crude oil contaminated soil. Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering. 2019;2(1):1-11.

Douglas SI, Barisi SP. Bioremediation of crude oil polluted terrestrial soil using Aspergillus clavatus and Pichia spp. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019; 8(3):733-744.

Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA. Microbiology. 6th edition, McGraw Hill, London. 2005;23-67.

Bento FM, Carmago AO, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT. Comparative bioremediation of soil contaminated with diseal oil by natural attenution, biostimulation and bioaugumentation. Bioresourse Technology Journal. 2005; 96:1049-1055.

Odokuma LO, Dickson AA. Bioremediation of crude oil polluted tropical mangrove environment. Journal of Applied Science Environmental Management. 2003;7(2): 23-29.

Brusseau ML. The impact of physical, chemical and biological factors on biodegradation, in proceedings of the International Conference on Biotechnology for Soil Remediation: Scientific Bases and Practical Applications R. Serra, Ed., C.I.P.A. S.R.L., Milan, Italy. 1998;81–98.

Chaillan F, Chaıneau H, Point V, Saliot A. Oudot J. Factors inhibiting bioremediation of soil contaminated with weathered oils and drill cuttings, Environmental Pollution. 2006;144(1):255–265.

Environment Guidelines and Standard for the Petroleum Industry in Nigeria (EGASPIN). Standard guideline through Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR). Revised Edition. 2002;227-288.

American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association, Washington, DC., USA. 2005; 12:45-54.

Ogbonna DN, Iwegbue CMA, Sokari TG. Effect of bioremediation on the growth of Okro (Abelmoshus esculetus) in the Niger Delta soil. Environmentalist. 2007;27:303-309.

Shang HA, Ilori MO, Amund OO, Teniola OD, Olatope SO. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in a polluted tropical stream. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007;23(8):1149–1159.

Chikere CB, Ekwuabu CB. Molecular characterization of autochthonous hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria in oil-polluted sites at Bodo Community, Ogoni land, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology. 2014;27:28–33.