Marital Adjustment, Love, Personal Intimacy, Personality, Dyadic Coping and Spirituality on Marital Stability

Main Article Content

S. Priyadharshini
Rejani Thudalikunnil Gopalan


Marital Stability is interpreted as whether a couple in a marriage remains together, instead of separating or getting divorced. It is also called as marital longevity or duration of marriage. The aim of the study is to find the relationship between different psychosocial factor (marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy personality, dyadic coping, and spirituality) and marital stability. For the purpose of sampling, thirty married couples were randomly selected using stratified random sampling. The measuring tools used were Locke-Wallace marital adjustment questionnaire (Marital adjustment), Love scale (Love), Personal assessment of intimacy in relationship (Personal intimacy), Big five inventory (personality), Dyadic coping inventory (Dyadic coping) and the daily spiritual experience scale (Spirituality).Six null hypotheses were raised and tested using descriptive and inferential statistics (Percentage, mean, standard deviation and correlation). The research finding shows that there is a significant negative correlation between sexual intimacy and marital stability(r= -.44 and p<.01). All other variables (Marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy, personality, dyadic coping and spirituality) are not shown to be contributing to marital stability.

Dyadic coping, personality, marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy, spirituality, marital stability, marital longevity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Priyadharshini, S., & Gopalan, R. T. (2020). Marital Adjustment, Love, Personal Intimacy, Personality, Dyadic Coping and Spirituality on Marital Stability. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 7(4), 1-16.
Original Research Article


Kotwal DA, Narayanacharya PV, Shastri JC, Venkatacharvulu S, Data NB. Vivaha Samskara: The Hindu Ceremony. World Hindu Council of America (VHPA); 2011.

Becker Gary S. 1981 Treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Enlarged edition; 1991.

Weiss RL, Heyman RE. A clinical– research overview of couple’s interactions. In WK Halford and HJ Markman (Eds). Clinical Handbook of Marriage and Couples Interventions. 1997;13-41. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Fitzpatrick MA, Ritchie LD. Communication theory and the family. Chapter From Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods: A Contextual Approach. 1993; 565 –589.
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_22

Gottman JM. A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology. 1993;7(1):57-75.

Karney BR, Bradbury TN. The longitudinal course of Marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;118:3–54.

Sousou SD. The role of agreeableness and neuroticism in marital satisfaction: Actor and partner contribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of Newyork at Albany; 2004.

Jankowiak W, Fischer EF. A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology. 1992;31(2):149.

Reis HD, Schaver P. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: In S. Duck; D.F. Hay, S.E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montogomary (Eds). Handbook of personal relationship: Theory, Research and Intervention. 1988;367-389. John Wiley & Sons.

Laurenceau JP, Barret LF, Rovine MJ. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily diary and multilevel modelling approach. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005;19(2):314-323.

Amiri S, Khousheh M, Ranjbar F, Fakhari A, Mohagheghi A, Farnam A, Alizadeh A. Factors related to marital satisfaction in women with major depressive disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;7(4): 164-169

Decuyter M, Bolle MD, Fruyt FD. Personality similarities, perceptual accuracy and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationship; 2012.

Craig RJ, Olson RE. 16PF Profiles and typologies for patient seen in marital therapy. Psychology Reports; 1995.

Costa PT, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment. 1992;4(1):5-13.

McCrae RR, Costa PT. The NEO personality inventory: Using the five factor model in counselling. Journal of Counselling and Development. 1991;69(4): 367-372.

Goldberg LR. The structure of phenotype personality traits. American Psychology. 1993;48(1):26-34.

Letzring TD, Noftle EE. Predicting relationship quality from self –verification of broad personality traits among romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality. 2010;44(3):353-362.

Barelds DPH. Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality. 2005;19(6):501-518.

Shiota MN, Levenson RW. Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: Similarity in big five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long term marriages. Psychology and Ageing. 2007;22(4):666-675.

Botwin MD, Buss DM, Shackelford TK. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality. 1997; 65(1):107-136.

Caughlin JP, Huston TL, Houts RM. How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity and marital satisfaction; 2000.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514:78.2.326

Davila J, Krney BR, Hall JW, Bradbury TN. Depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction: Within subject association and the moderating effect of gender and neuroticism. Journal of Family Psychology. 2003;17:557-570.

Gattis KS, Berns S, Simpson LE, Christensen A. Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology. 2004;18(4): 564-574

Hayes N, Joseph S. Big 5 correlated of three measures of subjective well being. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;34:723-727.

Kelley EL, Conley JJ. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;52(1):27-40.

Stroud CB, Durbin CE, Saigal SD, Knobloch – Fedders LM. Normal and abnormal personality traits are associated with marital satisfaction for both men and women: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis. Journal of Research in Personality. 2010;44:466-477.

Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping, a systemic – transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology. 1997;47(2):137-141.

Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In TA Revenson, K Kayser, G Bodenmann (Eds). Decade of behaviour, couple coping with stress: Emerging Perspective on Dyadic Coping. 2005;33-49.

Banerjee S, Basu J. Personality factors, attachment style and coping strategies in couples with good and poor marital quality. Psychological Studies. 2014;59(1):59-67.

Lichter DT, Carmalt JH. Religion and marital quality of low income couples. Social Science Research. 2009;38(1):168 187.

Kaslow F, Robinson JA. Long term satisfying marriages: Perceptions of contributing factors. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 1996;24(2).

Litzinger S, Gordon KC. Exploring relationship among communication, sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2005; 31(5):409-424.

Mattson RE, Rogge RD, Johnson MD, Davidson EKB, Fincham FD. The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationship. 2013;20(2):328-355.

Timm TM, Keiley MK. The effects of differentiation of self adult attachment and sexual communication on sexual and marital satisfaction: A path analysis. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2011; 37:206-223. Available:

Waldinger RJ, Schulz MS, Hauer ST, Allen JP. Reasing other’s emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality and stability. Journal of Family Psychology. 2004;18:58-71. Available:

Bodenmenn G. Stress and coping in couples. Gottingen, Germany: hogrefe; 2000

John OP, Srivastava S. The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Parvin & O.P. John (Eds). Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. 1999;102-138. Guildford Press.

Underwood LG, Teresi JA. The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002; 24(1):22-33

Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic measurement: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and The Family. 1976; 38(1):1528. Available:

O’Leary KD, Fincham F, Turkewitz H. Assessment of Positive feeling towards spouse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51(6):949-951.

Haynes SN, Follingstad DR, Sullivan JC. Assessment of marital satisfaction and interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1979;47:789-791.

Patterson GR, Weiss RL, Hops H. Training of marital skills: Some problems and concepts. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of behaviour modification. NeW York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1974.

Rubin Z. Measurement of Romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1970;16(2):265-273.

Schaefer MT, Olson DH. Assessing intimacy: The PAIR inventory. Journal of Marital Family Therapy. 1981;7(1):47-60.

Kimmel C, Vander Veen F. Factors of marital adjustment in Locke’s marital adjustment test. Journal of Marriage and The Family. 1974;36:57-63.

Moos RH, Moos BS. A topology of family social environments. Family Process. 1976;15(4):357-371.

Dao T, Donghyuck L, Chang H. Acculturation level, perceived English fluency, perceived social support level and depression among Taiwanese international students. College Student Journal. 2007; 42(2):287-296.

Tananuraksakul N, Hall D. International student’s emotional security and dignity in an Australian context: An aspect of psychological well being. Journal of Research International Education. 2011; 10(2):189-200. Available:

Lucas RE. Personality and subjective well-being in M. Eid and R.J. Larsen eds. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York, Guilford Press. 2008;171-94.

Ebenuwa-okoh EE. Personality variables as correlates of marital adjustment among married persons in delta state of Nigeria. Eduaction Research and Review. 2008;3: 275-279.

Ghoroghi S, Hassan SA, Baba M. Function of Family – of – origin experiences and marital adjustment among married Iranian students of university Putra Malasyia. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2012;4(3):94.

Acevedo BP, Aron A. Does a long term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology. 2009;13(1):59-65.

Lazaridies, Belanger C, Sabourin S. Communication behaviours as predictions of long term dyadic adjustment: Personality as a moderator of long term dyadic adjustment. International Journal of Human and Social Science. 2010;5:10.

Karimi R, Bakhtiyari M, Arani AM. Protective factors of marital stability in long-term marriage globally: A systematic review. Epidemiology and Health.2019;41. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2019023